Recent Articles:

Healthcare AI News 4/1/26

News

image

Noah Labs receives FDA breakthrough device designation for Vox, which detects heart failure from a five-second daily voice recording.

image

Penguin AI launches a build-your-own platform that allows health systems to design digital workers. The tool includes 100 pre-built digital workers for tasks such as HCC retrospective coding, clinical document summarization, and eligibility verification.

image

Butterfly Network receives FDA clearance for an AI-powered ultrasound tool that estimates gestational age in under two minutes without requiring a sonography-trained user.

image

Hartford HealthCare begins beta testing PatientGPT, which uses patient medical records to provide guidance and education and allows users to launch a virtual visit or schedule an appointment. The tool was developed by K Health.

image

Clinical copilot developer Avo raises $10 million in a Series A round.

Ambience Healthcare introduces Chart Chat for Nursing, which embeds conversational AI in the EHR to allow inpatient nurses to query patient charts in plain language.

image

OpenEvidence adds medical coding capability to its evidence-based knowledge system.


Business

image

Jimini Health, which offers a patient-facing behavioral health triage chatbot called Sage, raises a $17 million seed round.


Other

NYC Health + Hospitals President and CEO Mitchell Katz, MD says in a panel discussion that AI could immediately replace a significant portion of radiologists. He asked panel attendees whether there is any reason not to pursue state regulation that would allow AI to read imaging studies without supervision, referring only abnormal findings to a radiologist. A radiologist responds:

Undeniable proof that confidently uninformed hospital administrators are a danger to patients: easily duped by AI companies that are nowhere near capable of providing patient care. Any attempt to implement AI-only reads would immediately result in patient harm and death, and only someone with zero understanding of radiology would say something so naive. But in some sense, they’re correct: Hospitals are happy to cut costs even if it means patient harm, as long as it’s legal.


Contacts

Mr. H, Lorre, Jenn, Dr. Jayne.
Get HIStalk updates.
Send news or rumors.
Follow on X, Bluesky, and LinkedIn.
Sponsorship information.
Contact us.

HIStalk Interviews Reed Liggin, CEO, SlicedHealth

April 1, 2026 Interviews No Comments

Reed Liggin, RPh, MBA is co-founder and CEO of SlicedHealth.

image

Tell me about yourself and the company.

I went to University of Georgia College of Pharmacy and got into healthcare as a hospital pharmacist. I got  an opportunity to get into health tech in the e-prescribing field in the late 1990s. I worked for a California company that flamed out in the dot-com bust of 1999. I worked briefly for Allscripts as it was becoming an EHR company, and from there I went to McKesson and started selling the number one hospital pharmacy system in the market that they had acquired. I built my career at McKesson, which is where I really learned the business.

I started my own company, RazorInsights, in 2009 with a couple of friends from McKesson. I worked there for almost three years and we had an exit in 2015 to Athenahealth. I was then hired as CEO of EazyScripts in Chicago. We were doing e-prescribing for telemedicine. We successfully sold that company in the spring of 2019. From there, I got together with one of my co-founders from the Razor days, Mike McKenzie, and three other seasoned health tech guys who had worked for us at Razor and Athena to start SlicedHealth.

Our goal was to solve the payer contract intelligence problem for community hospitals, which largely lacked solutions. Going back to the Razor days, we got asked about contract management and payer contract intelligence a lot. As the problems of denied claims and underpaid claims exacerbated over the last few years, we saw a great opportunity to serve that part of the market. 

Today we serve 140 clients in community hospitals under 400 beds across the country, and many of those are under 100 beds. We also have some larger health systems, and we also serve specialty practices like orthopedics, pain management, and women’s health. We offer payer contract intelligence, hospital price transparency, claim estimation for the No Surprise Act, and business intelligence. We recently introduced embedded artificial intelligence, which is called SlicedIQ. Clients can pick any module or combination of modules that suit their needs. We launched in January 2020, just in time for the pandemic, and have been doing this for just over six years

What creates the situation that you call hidden underpayments and what is the financial impact of fixing it?

I don’t want to totally point the finger at payers, but I will point the finger at the payers to a degree. They use sophisticated technology, including AI, to deny claims for various reasons. They are often good reasons, such as where the provider hasn’t put the right information into the claim or has made mistakes on their side, and they are sending it to the payer incorrectly. But often we see systematic denials of claims for a variety of reasons, and we often see claims that are underpaid where something in the contract is not adhered to. It is inefficiency in a highly complex system.

It’s interesting that the customer has to buy the technology to catch their vendor trying to cheat them. Would a payer that doesn’t follow the contract ever be assessed financial or legal penalties?

I’m not aware of any. Providers that are large enough could probably take those things to court and get some restitution. But smaller providers, such as independent community hospitals and practices, have a lot less leverage to fight those sorts of things.

Many people don’t know how bad the problem is. Or they know, but it’s a lot worse than they think. There has been a lack of awareness over the last few years. We saw a big technology gap in certain parts of the market, independent specialty practices and smaller community hospitals. Their core vendor might have a contract management module or some old technology that didn’t do the best job in the world and relied on the client to do the install and maintenance work. It was a big burden for organizations that are already resource constrained. That was the problem we set out to solve.

Does provider adoption of technology level the playing field, or does it just force both sides to one-up each other as in AI wars?

It absolutely levels the playing field and makes the system more efficient. We take in claims data every night through a file drop in the cloud from the claims clearinghouse that the organization uses. As claims are processed nightly, users can review the next morning what hasn’t been paid correctly. You can get on top of these problems quicker and with a high degree of accuracy.

How do large health systems address the issue differently?

Epic and Oracle offer strong native technology in their platforms. As you get above 400 beds, there’s a lot of penetration and use of this technology that we found was not being used in those community hospitals. We had discovered, through our time at Athena and afterward, that a lot of specialty practices were not using that technology as well.

Is it inevitable that revenue cycle is complex when companies are making money from that complexity?

Absolutely. Healthcare is inherently complex and participants can benefit from leveraging that with technology, such as gaming the system by holding on to money longer.

Everybody expected the heaviest use of AI to be in imaging and clinical work, but the big expectations and the gold rush often involve revenue cycle management. How do you run a business around that when AI changes literally every day?

You just described a day in my life right now. As a management team, we are huddling almost daily on how fast things are changing because of artificial intelligence.

I’ll give you a good example. We released our SliceIQ platform, which embeds AI in the payer contract intelligence platform. You had the ability to get step-by-step instructions on how to resolve a claim that had been denied or underpaid, generate an appeal letter, that sort of thing.

We came out with that last November. By January, a half dozen companies were doing the same thing. They tended to be niche companies, startups around AI technology to specifically address mainly pre-adjudication claims issues to prevent them from happening in the first place, but resolving them post-adjudication as well. They were companies that I had never heard of, so we will see if what they are doing is real. We are starting to see some bigger players in the clearinghouse space and the EHR side that are starting to come out with that same sort of technology.

For us as a small company, we have a nice customer base. We were trying to figure out how to solve unique problems in the midst of all this. We are focused on payer contract intelligence, because only a few companies do it and even fewer of them do it well. We are making sure that we carve out what I call our little blue ocean of unique problem solving, while a vast red ocean of people are trying to use AI to automate everything in the revenue cycle.

A payer recently announced that their analysis showed that providers are upcoding, as evidenced by lack of diagnosis or treatment for what they billed. Will it become a trust but verify situation, where providers will need to submit more data or payers will take on the role of clinical auditor?

Absolutely. As the technology enables it, the bar will be raised. You have value-based care as well. We’ve held off moving into that and the jury is out on where it will go, but it seems to be starting to grow. That’s an area that we will help our clients solve.

As a pharmacist, what do you think about how pharmacy has changed? Are you happy with the contributions that technology has made?

It has been overcomplicated by being part of Meaningful Use. Interoperability should have been job one, but it got pushed to the back burner. It doesn’t feel like we are as far along as we should be in some ways.

In other ways, pharmacists in particular are using technology in a very good ways. Nobody has to read physicians’ handwriting any more. We eliminated a lot of safety issues around illegible handwriting and drug interactions that weren’t being caught. From a safety standpoint, we’ve come a long way across all clinical systems.

But it’s still an issue that when you go to a couple of different doctors, if they aren’t using the same system, good luck in being able to share information. We’re still a long way from where we need to be. That’s been frustrating for me as a clinician, where I go to one specialist and then another specialist, they are on completely different systems, and I have to educate them on what’s going on with my whole record and hope they get it right.

The terms CPOE and e-prescribing aren’t used much these days since those are now standard. Will we see other areas where technology will become an expected piece of plumbing that replaced processes that we barely remember?

As someone who is sitting in the claims and revenue cycle space, I don’t think it will get any simpler anytime soon, especially as you introduce VBC contracting and all the data that it will require. The bar will continue to go up as far as what providers need to provide to make sure that their claims are paid properly. Trust but verify systems will ensure that they are getting paid exactly what they are supposed to be.

On the clinical side, I haven’t thought through what will become automated. I assume that prior authorization will get there, but that will still require payers to get some uniformity to make it possible. I tell my team that if you’ve done one claims appeal, you’ve done one claims appeal, because they are like snowflakes. Prior authorization is not much different.

How much of the eventual success of an early-stage company is the result of planning versus just reacting to events as they happen?

I think it’s reacting. We started this business with payer contract intelligence, or payer contract management if you want to call it that, as a goal. But we really started it around business intelligence. Then a pandemic happened, the price transparency law came along, and the No Surprises billing act came along. We just continued to react to those things. They led us down a path to what has become our flagship product, which is payer contract intelligence. But if you had asked me on day one if that was the path that we would take, I don’t know that I would have said that.

Particularly with AI and how fast things are happening, you have to react well to change. You set a plan, but you will have to adjust that plan. We like to stay focused. We have had a lot of opportunities to build other things in the revenue cycle besides payer contracting and price transparency, which uses essentially the same data. We have resisted that, because we want to stay focused. Having built a whole EHR system, with clinicals and financials [laughs], I’ve learned that’s certainly a better way to run a business.

Do you see a day where AI allows tiny companies that have few employees to be major players in health tech or healthcare in general?

I do. We have a project going on where we have been able to do some amazing stuff with AI, and we will be pushing out a couple of new products in the next couple of months. Really it was one person who was behind all of that. AI is going to create opportunities for people to create things and fill in gaps. What I’ve always done in healthcare is to look for gaps where certain providers were underserved or missing capabilities or services that they needed. AI will give people the ability to get there faster with a lot less capital.

What is the company’s strategy over the next few years? 

We want to continue to be known as the best, fastest payer contract intelligence company in the market. We will continue to push up-market. We focus on three key things for our clients. Taking the work off their plate of the build and maintenance of the system and getting them live faster than traditional companies have, and using AI to lean into that those two things to service our customers better. The third thing is making our pricing as low as possible. Obviously as a for-profit company you want to keep decent margins, but as we drive our costs down, we will share that with our customers. That will make it a no-brainer for them to want to do business with us.

We see ourselves as a disruptive force because of the way that we build a model contracts faster using technology, and then take the work off our clients’ plates. We will continue to lean into that. Then we will look for ways to expand our value in that payer contract space. We have AI that will give clients advice on how to negotiate a new contract with the payer, what point they should try to negotiate to improve their deal. We are looking at other ways to expand the knowledge that clients will have around payer contracts.

Morning Headlines 4/1/26

March 31, 2026 Headlines No Comments

HHS Aligns Health Technology Leadership to Deliver Data Liquidity, Affordability, and an AI-Enabled Health Care System for Americans

HHS retires the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and ASTP leadership role and restores ONC to its former role as the sole government body charged with advancing healthcare technology policies and regulations.

Oracle cutting thousands in latest layoff round as company continues to ramp AI spending

Oracle conducts massive layoffs across its service lines, with some sources indicating that the company will part ways with 20,000 to 30,000 employees.

Jimini Health Gets $17M to Enhance Patient-Facing AI Infrastructure

Behavioral health support AI chatbot developer Jimini Health raises $17 million in seed funding.

Omaha healthcare company files for bankruptcy amid lawsuits over alleged fraud

Virtual nursing and technology company Banyan Medical Systems files for bankruptcy amid an investor lawsuit and claims that its former CFO stole millions of dollars.

Avo Raises $10 Million Series A to be the Clinical AI Platform Powered by Trusted Knowledge

Clinical copilot developer Avo raises a $10 million Series A round.

News 4/1/26

March 31, 2026 News No Comments

Top News

image

HHS retires the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and ASTP leadership role that was created in 2024. The move restores ONC to its former role as the sole government body charged with advancing healthcare technology policies and regulations.

National Coordinator Thomas Keane, MD, MBA will continue in that position.

HHS has also moved the roles of CTO, chief artificial intelligence officer, and chief data officer from ONC to its Office of the CIO.


Reader Comments

image

From Yup: “Re: Oracle Health. You predicted a while back that Oracle Health SVP of products Suhas Uliyar would not see a single Epic-to-Oracle displacement before he moved on to a different job. It seems that he has left Oracle entirely while seeing the aforesaid zero displacements.” Suhas Uliyar said last July that the Oracle-to-Epic train would reverse course and send former customers clamoring back to Oracle Health after seeing the technical whizzbangery that he was touting. I countered that he would leave that job without seeing a single Epic displacement, which is what apparently happened. I will defer to the opinion of Redditor DeCernerfucation from eight months ago:

Suhas has been in the healthcare space for how long? A couple years? Amateur. That’s an awfully big stupid mouth for him to have with such a small amount of experience. He’ll probably just move on to something else when he finds out how hard it will be. This kind of hubris pretty much applies to all of them. I have no respect for their unprofessional trash-talking. The Dunning-Kruger effect is alive and well with Oracle leadership.


Sponsored Events and Resources

None scheduled soon. Contact Lorre to have your resource listed.


Acquisitions, Funding, Business, and Stock

image

Oracle conducted massive layoffs Tuesday that are apparently continuing, with some sources indicating that the company will part ways with 20,000 to 30,000 employees. Those who were affected learned of their status via a 6 a.m. email that was sent to their personal email address and by discovering that their access to the company’s electronic systems had been revoked overnight. They were not offered a chance to speak with a human, ask questions, or return to the office. Oracle Health was reportedly not spared, based on many LinkedIn posts from those affected. ORCL shares rose 6% on the news.

Health Management Associates acquires Medicaid-focused technology, analytics, and compliance company HealthTech Solutions.

image

Virtual nursing and technology company Banyan Medical Systems files for bankruptcy amid an investor lawsuit and claims that its former CFO stole millions of dollars. The company’s owner says that the former CFO has stated that he will repay the company the $21 million he owes. Banyan has sued the former CFO and his 24 shell companies, claiming that he obtained dual citizenship in the Caymans and bought a $4 million house and a $1 million boat there.

image

Clinical copilot developer Avo raises a $10 million Series A round.


Sales

  • Rush University System for Health (IL) selects Charge Infusion automated coding and billing software from Medaptus.
  • Mount Sinai Health System (NY) will make OpenEvidence’s medical AI tool available from within its EHR.
  • Carina Health Network (CO) will implement Innovaccer’s Healthcare Intelligence Cloud.
  • Hendry Regional Medical Center (FL) will replace four separate systems with Meditech Expanse.


Announcements and Implementations

image

Sutter Health goes live as the first site to use Epic Emmie, a chatbot that can answer patient questions.

Linus Health secures a supplier agreement with group purchasing organization Provista.

The Veterans Health Administration implements an agentic AI-based operating system developed by Salesforce across 150 VA facilities. Built on Slack, the system unifies service management and patient care coordination.

Document Storage Systems will integrate Sightview’s EHR for eyecare with the VA’s current EHR.

EHR/PM services company Focus Solutions changes its name to Focus while insisting that “the name change is not cosmetic.”


Government and Politics

The McChord Clinic at McChord Air Force Base (WA) rolls out ambient listening technology as part of the DoD’s facility-wide implementation.


Sponsor Updates

  • Agfa HealthCare announces that Spain’s Osakidetza health network has implemented Agfa Enterprise Imaging.
  • Altera Digital Health releases a new client story titled “Transforming Care at St. Luke’s Medical Center Through Digital Health Innovation.”
  • The “This Week Health” podcast features Clearsense executives in an episode titled “From Archive to Intelligence: How Clearsense Is Embedding AI to Accelerate Healthcare Cost Optimization.”
  • Clearwater will sponsor the  SCALE Community Gold Club Retreat 2026 April 10-12 in Park City, UT.
  • Black Book Research founder and President Doug Brown publishes a new book titled “The Black Book of Reshoring: The Essential Guide to America’s New Manufacturing Boom.”
  • Artera shares the successful results Atlantic Health achieved after implementing its AI agents for colonoscopy patient outreach.

Blog Posts


Contacts

Mr. H, Lorre, Jenn, Dr. Jayne.
Get HIStalk updates.
Send news or rumors.
Follow on X, Bluesky, and LinkedIn.
Sponsorship information.
Contact us.

Morning Headlines 3/31/26

March 30, 2026 Headlines 1 Comment

VHA Deploys Agentic AI Operating System to Improve Care Delivery

The Veterans Health Administration implements an agentic AI-based operating system developed by Salesforce across 150 VA facilities.

Stedi Raises $50M in Series C Funding

Healthcare clearinghouse company Stedi announces $50 million in Series C funding, bringing its total raised to $142 million.

Oracle Scales Up Nashville Offices to Support Rapid Growth

Oracle signs an additional lease in Nashville, increasing its footprint to three locations to accommodate anticipated growth.

Curbside Consult with Dr. Jayne 3/30/26

March 30, 2026 Dr. Jayne No Comments

One of my colleagues from medical school is a residency program director. He was having a virtual conversation with his fellow faculty members about the program’s plans for technology and AI-related education in the coming year. He mentioned that he has a friend who practices clinical informatics and has some experience with AI and asked if it was OK to pull me into the chat.

The topics that they had been discussing were basic, including EHR efficiency, inbox management, and accessing the program’s online educational tools. One faculty member had suggested a lecture about AI, but that was the limit of the discussion.

The program is affiliated with a major health system. I was surprised to learn that none of the program’s faculty members are involved with any of the system’s informatics committees. No faculty member has been identified as a physician superuser for the EHR. Faculty members have had no involvement in the development of order sets or other tools, where their input might result in adjustments that would make them more useful for trainees or students.

I quickly figured out that my colleague’s invitation was not only a request for subject matter expertise, but also a cry for help. Because of the time commitments of being program director, he doesn’t feel like he has the bandwidth to lead technology initiatives, so he was looking for assistance with convincing his faculty that stepping up would be beneficial.

We all agreed that an asynchronous chat wasn’t the best venue to discuss the issues. They agreed to extend an upcoming faculty meeting so that I could attend and give some advice. 

In the meantime, I asked them to brainstorm tech-related topics about which they wish they knew more, tech they’ve seen residents and students use but not faculty, understanding of organizational governance and technology policies, and articles they have seen in their specialty literature that address tech-related or educational issues.

I asked them to send those to me in real time so that I could start to put together an agenda for the meeting. I assured them that I would keep their submissions confidential so that they wouldn’t have to worry about what their peers thought about their technology knowledge or lack thereof.

I also asked my colleague to reach out to his health system to ask if they had specific resources that are targeted towards trainees and learners. His program is the only one in his area, but the health system is a multistate organization and has other residency training programs.

With that in mind, I suggested that he reach out to the chairs of graduate medical education at the other sites to see if they had any recommendations. Nothing is worse than reinventing the wheel, but sometimes solving your own problem, you forget about resources that might be available. He agreed to do that before our meeting.

I did some quick web searching and found a number of resources that are available through the specialty’s faculty development organization, including a telemedicine curriculum. I also found a digital health curriculum that had been shared by a residency program at a similarly sized hospital, which seemed like a good start.

I also found some conferences that are related to technology in academic medicine. They are targeted toward staff and faculty from medical schools, but they looked like they would also be useful for residency faculty.

I also investigated the residency program itself. I discovered that it had only a few full-time faculty members, but a greater number of part-time or voluntary community faculty who are involved in precepting the residents. I suggested that those physicians might also be good resources to consult about their use of technology in the real world of private practice as well as their interest in AI and other related topics.

While I was searching for resources, I ran across some curricular areas that weren’t covered during my time in residency and was glad that they are now part of training. During my early career, medical aid in dying consisted of a single headline-worthy practitioner. It’s now available in multiple states.

I also ran across a free curriculum for managing personal finances, to which all medical students and residents should be exposed. Personal finance is required for high school graduation in a number of states, but I still encounter students, residents, and even young attending physicians who don’t understand the basics of managing their debt and resources.

The curriculum element that most warmed my heart covered using evidence-based resources in clinical practice. It’s one thing to talk about evidence-based medicine, but another to actually incorporate recommendations into patient care, particularly given challenges with insurance coverage of services and the rise in patients who are skeptical about medical recommendations.

The curriculum also includes surveys that assess the effectiveness of the learning module, which included a pre-test to uncover what residents already knew and a post-test to evaluate whether they felt the module made them better prepared for the realities of practice.

In the ultimate “copy off the student next to you” move, I found a program in the same specialty that listed its entire technology curriculum on its website, likely as part of their residency recruiting strategy. The program emphasizes that it strives to “foster an environment where technology enables and enhances patient care.” I did a quick comparison with my own residency program as well as one for which I serve as a preceptor and I didn’t see anything like that on their websites. I wonder if this is a new trend for programs to specifically call that out or whether that program is ahead of the game for technology enablement.

After a couple of days, I began receiving emails from the faculty members with their ideas and questions. One noted that he was glad that I had offered a confidential option to submit his thoughts since he really doesn’t understand “all the fuss about AI” and felt that he must be missing something but didn’t want to seem “like a fossil” by asking.

Another mentioned that she has a particular interest in technology because her husband works for a company that handles a lot of process automation. She didn’t feel like she knew the avenues for participating at the hospital level and was too overwhelmed with other duties to ask.

The faculty meeting occurred last week, and I thought it went well. I think that they appreciated having a relative outsider who they could bounce ideas off of. They were interested in the program that I had found that listed its technology curriculum online and were also excited about some learning modules that had been created by programs elsewhere in the health system.

I had to do very little during the call. They seemed motivated by the fact that other programs offer specific technology features to residents. I’m not sure how this program fared in the recent residency match, but if they didn’t match their ideal candidates, it might be a big motivation.

This started as a favor for a friend, but it made me wonder if there is some room for consulting efforts around this topic. I’m not looking to take on new work, but I would imagine that if one program is struggling in this regard, others are likely in the same position. I will be asking about that at my next informatics conference.

Do residency programs at your institution use technology as a recruiting tool, or are they just trying to keep up? Leave a comment or email me.

Email Dr. Jayne.

Readers Write: AI in Revenue Cycle Demands More Than Innovation

March 30, 2026 Readers Write No Comments

AI in Revenue Cycle Demands More Than Innovation
By Patrice Wolfe

Patrice Wolfe, MBA is CEO of AGS Health.

image

​It’s hard not to conclude that the US healthcare system is at an inflection point. After more than 40 years in this industry, I feel that few other moments (perhaps COVID?) have carried the same weight of urgency, disruption, and potential.

Our complex healthcare ecosystem has always operated under pressure. Financial constraints, reimbursement changes, and a shifting regulatory environment are constants in the revenue cycle and across the broader system. What is different now is the pace and scale of technological change, particularly with artificial intelligence (AI).​

Healthcare has never been known for leading in technological innovation. Our industry is deeply tied to regulatory requirements and complex data structures and infrastructures that tend to slow adoption. Even so, we are seeing rapid movement in several pockets of our industry. AI is no longer a future consideration. It is becoming central to how revenue cycle operations and care delivery evolve.​

At the same time, the conversation has shifted from possibility to practicality. The question is no longer what AI can do in theory, but what works in real-world environments that are constrained by margin pressure, operational complexity, limited data liquidity, and uncertainty.​

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and other recent legislative and policy changes are beginning to translate into real financial impact. Analysis from Premier Inc. suggests that as much as $68 billion in hospital revenue could be at risk, with some provider organizations facing net patient revenue declines of up to 10%. For many health systems, revenue cycle optimization has already been a key strategic priority. It is increasingly becoming a necessity across the board.​

At the same time, insurance coverage continues to shift. Federal Marketplace enrollment declined 5% in 2026. That is better than expected. But signup numbers are a poor proxy for coverage. Enrollees have until March 31 to pay their premium bill, and after that, coverage will be retroactively terminated, driving higher uninsurance rates. We won’t have a clear picture until July 2026 of the impact that this will have on the insurance mix.

Pressure is also coming from the payer side, where AI adoption has progressed more quickly. Roughly 20% of claims are now being denied, and more than 60% of those denials are never appealed. That represents both a growing challenge and an opportunity for providers to recover revenue more effectively.​

Against this backdrop, health systems are taking a more disciplined approach to AI investment.

Interest in denials management, prior authorization, automation, and clinical documentation integrity remains high. The use cases are compelling. However, the standard for adoption has changed. Organizations are demanding clear, measurable return on investment before committing to solutions that often require high upfront cost and operational change.​

This shift is reflected in conversations across the industry. One health system CIO recently described being approached by a steady stream of AI vendors, each pledging transformation. His response was direct. Show proven results in comparable environments or the conversation does not move forward.

That perspective is increasingly common. Emphasis is shifting to pragmatism over experimentation. Even with that focus, implementation is not simple.​

AI adoption requires more than selecting the right use case. It depends on underlying capabilities that many organizations are still developing. Cybersecurity architecture and governance must be strong enough to support more advanced technologies. Oversight, both operational and regulatory, remains in flux. Federal-level AI regulation has shown some movement, but clarity is limited on what that framework will ultimately look like. In the meantime, organizations are moving forward in an environment that is defined by uncertainty.​

Given these conditions, the way forward is not about broad, rapid adoption. It is about targeted, disciplined execution. There is real opportunity. Modeling from McKinsey & Company suggests that AI could reduce provider collection costs by 30% to 60% over time. Realizing that potential will require a measured approach that balances automation with skilled human expertise.​

Innovation on its own is not enough. Solutions must function within existing workflows, not outside of them. Healthcare revenue cycle workflows are complex, and successful transformation depends on adopting technology that reduces friction rather than adds to it. When done effectively, this can streamline manual work, boost financial performance, and improve both patient and provider experience. The common thread is execution. ​

Healthcare does not lack ideas or innovation. What it requires now is the ability to apply both in ways that are practical, scalable, and measurable. AI will play a central role in that transformation, but only if it is deployed with discipline and a clear understanding of what success looks like in actual conditions.

Readers Write: Revealing Hidden Rural Health Funding Opportunities

March 30, 2026 Readers Write No Comments

Revealing Hidden Rural Health Funding Opportunities
By Phil Sobol

Phil Sobol is chief commercial officer at CereCore.

image

Rural healthcare leaders are some of the most resourceful people in the industry. But even the most seasoned administrators are often surprised to learn how many funding opportunities exist beyond the federal bills that dominate the news cycle, including state-specific grants, national resource hubs, and coalition programs. The money is more accessible than you think. Here is where to start.

It’s Not Just About Federal Funding

Sweeping federal legislation like the Rural Health Transformation Program creates meaningful opportunities for rural communities that are working to reimagine care delivery and outcomes. That program alone supports systemic transformation at scale. But for many rural hospitals and health systems, waiting for large legislative vehicles to materialize and then competing for a slice of a heavily subscribed pool is not a funding strategy.

Another path is to look at the full ecosystem of available funding, much of which carries fewer restrictions and less competition than headline-grabbing programs.

State-Level Funding Is Underused

One of the most overlooked categories of rural health funding is state-specific grants and programs. States vary enormously in what they offer, but patterns emerge when they are studied closely. Several states have developed dedicated funding streams specifically for coalition formation. Rural healthcare delivery increasingly depends on networks of providers coordinating care rather than isolated facilities doing it alone.

Funding themes that recur across states include clinical integration, access and infrastructure investment, and health information exchange. The specific states prioritizing each theme differ, which means that a funding opportunity that is perfectly suited to one organization might not exist for a neighbor two states over.

Geography matters. Knowing your state’s funding priorities and how those align with your organization’s strategic goals is not optional background knowledge. It is the foundation of a viable grant strategy.

National Resources That Deserve More Attention

Beyond state-level programs, several national resources provide structured pathways to funding that rural health leaders should bookmark and revisit regularly.

The Rural Health Information Hub is one of the most useful and underused resources. It is available to organizations in all states. It functions as a centralized library, aggregating funding opportunities, implementation tools, evidence-based models, and best practices from across the country. For organizations without a dedicated grants team, it’s an accessible entry point into what is available and what has worked elsewhere.

The Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) offers multiple grant programs that are specifically relevant to rural and underserved communities. Among these are programs that support coalition development and cross-provider partnerships, funding categories that are often better fits for rural organizations than infrastructure-heavy grants that assume resources and capacity those organizations simply don’t have.

Technology Is Often an Eligible Use of Funds

This is where the conversation gets particularly interesting for health system leaders who are thinking about long-term sustainability. Many of these funding programs explicitly support technology acquisition and modernization. That means that eligible organizations can use grant funding to purchase or upgrade core components of their technology stack, EHR systems, care coordination platforms, telehealth infrastructure, cybersecurity tools, and broadband connectivity.

For rural hospitals operating on decades-old systems, this changes the math significantly. Technology upgrades that once felt financially out of reach become viable when grant funding offsets or covers the cost entirely.

Telecommunications infrastructure is a particularly underused category. Rural facilities may qualify for programs that reduce or eliminate the cost of voice, data, and broadband services, which directly enables telemedicine, improves EHR performance, and strengthens care coordination across dispersed networks.

The key is to understand which programs allow technology as an eligible expense and structuring your application to demonstrate how that investment serves the broader clinical or community health outcome that the grant is designed to support.

Where to Start

If rural health funding feels overwhelming, the practical first step is not to research every available program simultaneously. It’s to get clarity on your organization’s most pressing strategic needs, whether that’s clinical integration, cybersecurity, telehealth capability, or a long-overdue technology upgrade, and then systematically identify which funding streams align with those priorities.

Start with the Rural Health Information Hub to understand the national landscape. Check HRSA’s current grant offerings for programs relevant to your community type and focus areas. Investigate what your state specifically offers, including any coalition-focused programs that may have fewer applicants and less competition than federal grants.

Funding will never solve every challenge that rural healthcare faces. But the right resources, pursued consistently and strategically, can meaningfully change what’s possible for your patients, your staff, and your community. That is worth the effort of knowing what’s available, and this is a good place to start.

Readers Write: RHTP is Money for Rural Hospitals, But States Say Maybe Not

March 30, 2026 Readers Write 1 Comment

RHTP is Money for Rural Hospitals, But States Say Maybe Not
By Mike Lucey

Mike Lucey, MBA is president of Community Hospital Advisors.

image

What happened to “hospital?”

“Protecting Rural Hospitals and Providers” is the title of Chapter 4 (section 71401) of the Big Beautiful Bill, which defines the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP). It is six pages of clear instruction on how $50 billion will be funneled into rural healthcare over five years. It outlines who gets it and how they can spend it.

This is an impressive economy of words for a federal document with such a bold objective. The word “hospital” appears 15 times in those six pages. The longer federal Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), which calls on states to submit applications for this funding, includes about 80 instances of “hospital,” which reveals an understanding that rural hospitals are the main access points for a wide variety of care, services, and resources for these communities.

But in many state applications, the word “hospital” fades or completely disappears. How is it possible that a law that was written to protect rural hospitals can morph into a series of state programs and agencies with no explicit mention of hospitals in their objectives?

Delivering rural healthcare faces two key challenges: too much space and too little money. When it comes to money, things are clear. The AMA reports that half of rural hospitals are operating at a deficit. The reasons are complex and varied, but location is intrinsic to all of them.

Too much space makes it less profitable to provide healthcare in a rural setting. Rural patients are, on average, two to three times farther from care than urban or suburban patients. The farther people are from anything, the less they do it. It doesn’t matter whether it is a gym, a bar, a parent, or a doctor. Distance becomes a reason or an excuse for why we can’t get there.

Can RHTP Help? Yes!

RHTP provides an opportunity to address these challenges by providing hospitals with the resources to hit new standards for how they provide care, especially in how they use technology. Nothing is going to change the length of a mile. But technology can close the access and contact gaps that distance creates.

Telehealth and home medical devices are great care tools that continue to get better over time. Full-access portals allow scheduling and reminders, and make messaging clinicians as easy as texting. Transportation can be scheduled and managed for patients with mobility issues through a fully functioning patient portal.

Once technology is in place to increase frequency and consistency of patient contact, technology can enhance these interactions and the quality of care with AI-augmented applications for notes, orders, and coding. These improve provider workflow, decrease burnout, allow better physician-patient interaction, and set the stage for AI clinical guidance. Finally, robust analytics and data management systems will improve the exchange of clinical data between facilities and providers, allowing high quality care regardless of location or specialty.

This vision for better rural care through technology is at the heart of RHTP, and these objectives are stated plainly in those six pages of section 71401. They are worthy and important goals. Improving just these three areas: patient contact, care delivery, and data exchange, improves care for every patient accessing every service the hospital provides. This care foundation can then expand to improve chronic care, nutrition, behavioral health and substance use disorder services, all of which are stated goals of RHTP.

RHTP exhibits a good understanding of the rural “too much space, too little money” challenge. It identifies the problems that space causes and then offers solutions and the money that is needed to deliver those solutions.

But somewhere between the authoring of the original bill and the allocation of funds from the states, many programs veer off course. Money wakes the bureaucratic beast, and the word “hospital” begins to fade.

But that doesn’t mean that the Rural, Critical Access, and Community Hospitals that serve one in five Americans, should accept defeat.

How Do Hospitals Stay at the Table?

My first encouragement to hospitals: don’t be complacent. Don’t take it as inevitable that this money is going to get siphoned off by large and connected entities. States vary widely in how friendly or not they are toward hospitals, but all will make some funds available directly. The difference in how much may well depend on how many hospitals are presenting well-constructed, justifiable projects.

Second: don’t be patient. States are just now assembling staff and drafting processes that will eventually become a method to distribute funds. Now is the time to get to work.

  • Create your project list. Not the list every rural hospital has, which includes things you will get to when you have the money. It is that list plus all the things that you have not even let yourself think about because the budget was so restricted.
  • Tie each project to your state initiatives and to the federal Use of Funds. Include estimated cost, timeline, and metrics.
  • When your state publishes its protocols, format your request to be compliant.
  • Whenever possible, team up with other sites. A collective of voices is harder to ignore.

Finally, don’t get discouraged. These processes are intentionally painful. OK, that is my opinion, but I find the process painful and have come to believe it is meant to cull the number of applicants and leave just the group that makes the process a profession. Stick with it.

Patients in rural communities are being left behind. RHTP is an opportunity to change that. There will always be too much space in rural healthcare, but with the right investment and execution, hospitals can close the gap and make a meaningful difference.

HIStalk Interviews Brent Benner, President, Canopii Collaborative

March 30, 2026 Interviews No Comments

Brent Benner is founder and president of Canopii Collaborative.

image

Tell me about yourself and the company.

I was born and raised in Texas up until about high school, then spent several years in the Midwest and Texas. I spent two years as a Peace Corps volunteer in Peru. I got back the day before Thanksgiving in 2008, when the stock market dropped like 500 points and launched the financial crisis. I had studied finance and entrepreneurship in school, but finance was definitely not going to be a good path at that moment. I worked at Microsoft for a while, but I was looking for something more purpose-driven like I had done in Peace Corps.

I was seeking jobs only in Austin and Chicago when Epic called me. I figured that a practice interview would be good, and I had heard good things about Madison. Epic just blew me away, so I took that job and ended up staying there for eight years. I started on the implementation team for Tapestry, which is part of the payer suite. I pretty quickly moved into director of product management for the payer suite and acted as the primary liaison between our clients and the software engineering team to help formulate the roadmap.

Ultimately, I couldn’t deal with those cold winters of Wisconsin anymore, so I returned to Texas and launched Canopii in 2021. While I was at Epic, it was pretty clear to me that a lot of firms provided Epic consulting services, but no one was hyper-focused on the payers. We launched Canopii to do just that, to provide purpose-built consulting for health plans and managed care organizations.

That intentional focus has led to a lot of growth. We started with four consultants in 2021, and now we have about 70, of whom 60 focus specifically on the Epic payer suite.

Epic’s payer suite is made up of a couple of products, with Tapestry and Payer Platform being the flagships. Those are used by health plans, essentially the insurance companies or the payer side of the business, rather than the provider side, although we work with a lot of provider-sponsored health plans that work in an integrated environment between the health system and the health plan.

What problems do you solve?

We primarily help our clients take advantage of the software that Epic has built. We’re not necessarily in the game of developing software ourselves. We work with our clients to implement and optimize the software so that they can get the most out of the Epic system.

We add the most value by bringing a product management mindset and being data-driven. We help our customers understand their operational metrics and turn the Epic complexity into operational clarity. We help them achieve the most with the software to improve those metrics and serve the members and providers that they work with.

How does your client measure the ROI of your services?

A lot of times, it depends on how we’re specifically working with them. We do a lot of implementation, so we’re the firm that customers turn to when they are going to implement the Epic payer suite. The return on investment there is focused on being on time, being on budget, and meeting the operational metrics that they have set as goals. Moving to the Epic system overall generates quite a bit of ROI, but you need to get the most out of it to realize that ROI.

We work with clients in other service lines, such as optimization or our application managed services division. AMS is focused on how we can generate cost savings by providing a managed services model in a more cost-effective manner while still delivering better quality. Then, what results can we deliver to your operational metrics?

For instance, a client that we are working with for AMS has decreased the interest and penalties they are paying by $10,000 a month. They have increased their auto adjudication rate, which is one of the most important metrics for payers and ultimately leads to significant labor cost savings.

How many of Epic’s customers use Epic’s Tapestry and Payer Platform?

About 50 organizations use Tapestry. It acts as a core administrative system for processing claims, enrollment eligibility, and medical management, such as utilization management, case management, and population health. A lot of those 50 organizations are provider-sponsored health plans.

Payer Platform focuses on interoperability between payers and health systems. That has been growing like wildfire. All of the largest commercial standalone health plans are now using Payer Platform.

Like with just about every other Epic product, Epic ultimately wins. We are seeing the large standalone health plans start to implement other components within the Epic payer suite, such as Blue Cross and Blue Shield Louisiana, as well as Humana implementing the medical management suite. Over the next couple of years, we’ll see some of these organizations take a look specifically at Tapestry and the claims processing applications too.

When you worked at Epic, how challenging was it to start working with organizations that aren’t health systems?

Most people who work in this ecosystem would have no idea that Tapestry was one of the first applications that Epic launched. They were working with a lot of staff model HMOs and provider-sponsored health plans, but obviously the core focus was on inpatient ambulatory and revenue cycle. Epic clearly established itself as the number one player in those particular markets.

It made sense for Epic to redirect their investment into other areas outside of the traditional four walls of healthcare. That is why you’ve seen growth in areas such as life sciences, but also within the payer suite. It was exciting as the director of product management to see those dollars start being redirected to invest in the payer suite. The payer suite has essentially been number two in investment since around like 2019.

How were you were involved with Epic’s significant investment in money and headcount to implement Kaiser?

Payer suite was  put on the map when we sold Tapestry to Kaiser, which had 11 million members. This was a $1 billion project overall, a little less than the $4 billion that was quoted for the health system, but parallel paths. They followed the same parallel path when the Northwest region and Oregon pushed Epic in the early days for the health system, but it was Georgia that implemented Tapestry and had real success there. That ultimately pushed the rest of the Kaiser organization to adopt it as well.

Our team had been 20 people on implementation and maybe 20 to 30 on R&D. All of a sudden, implementation was essentially 60 people and R&D grew to over 60, which could have even gone significantly higher than that just for Tapestry alone. The payer suite division grew to a couple of hundred people.

What did you learn in being an early-career employee who was put in charge of this massive project that was unlike Epic’s previous work?

An opportunity to have a career at Epic is incredible, because they take a bit of a sink-or-swim mentality. If you can survive and swim, there’s nothing like the opportunity to grow and be challenged. It’s an opportunity to rise, but it is stressful at times. We had some long weeks when we were doing the Kaiser implementation. But that completely exposed me to the industry and the ability to make an impact for Kaiser’s 11 million members. It was a phenomenal experience for sure.

What is the status of payer-provider collaboration and who benefits most from it?

I would hope that our patients, our members, and we as a society stand to benefit the most. We have over $500 billion in wasted administrative spend in healthcare year over year. We are called Canopii Collaborative because we truly believe that the only way that we can reduce that wasted administrative spend is by focusing on helping payers and providers collaborate to seek opportunities where we can do better data exchange, reduce unnecessary exams and tests, and change the model by how we pay and finance healthcare in moving from fee-for-service to value-based care to ultimately reduce that administrative spend.

We at Canopii established ourselves as the primary firm that you should turn to for the Epic payer suite. To start to bridge that payer and provider collaboration, we acquired Anchor Healthcare Consultants, which focused on revenue cycle. We are continuing to focus on that area.

Between CMS-0057-F and other regulation around interoperability and payer-provider collaboration, I have a lot of hope. I also have a lot of hope that AI will help accelerate this initiative and get us there faster. It is fundamental to reducing the total cost of care in this nation, which is frankly unsustainable.

How did your background prepare you to run companies?

I’ve been an entrepreneur ever since I was a kid. This is probably like my seventh company, but the first one that is truly successful.

My experience at Epic prepared me for leading a company like this. Epic still operates as fairly entrepreneurial. It’s very flat, and they place a lot of trust in those individuals who are essentially leading divisions like I did for the Tapestry team. That definitely prepared me, but it’s very different when you also have to handle all the backend function functions like finance, HR, and operations without the support of those great teams like they have at Epic.

It has been a fun ride, for sure. We were excited to be named the 67th fastest growing company on the Inc. 5000 last year. I’ve read that magazine since I was in middle school and an aspiring entrepreneur, so that was a pretty big milestone for us. We are excited about the growth to come.

How did you meet the challenge that faces most companies, but especially consulting firms, to create and maintain a culture?

It is cool to see team members who come over to Canopii who have typically worked at other consulting firms. The comments that they share with us are exciting. What makes the biggest difference is that we treat them as people and not just another number. Perhaps most importantly, they enjoy that we actually understand what they are doing day-in and day-out.

I previously worked at Epic. Our other co-founder was at Epic as well, and then worked as a consultant for a few years. We have maintained a culture where we understand what it is that you do day-in and day-out. We are here to support you. People have gotten into the mission and then the ecosystem that we have created. If you are struggling with an issue, you aren’t sitting on a deserted island. You can come and work with all of the other 60-plus experts that we have in the Epic payer suite to identify someone who has had a similar issue, then work together to bring that back to your client and add value.

What is the company’s strategy over the next few years?

A big focus for us will be expanding our application managed services team. We’ve seen a trend towards managed services over the last couple of years, I fundamentally believe that AI will accelerate that trend. We are focused on working with our clients there, because when we have the opportunity to support them end to end, we can make a significant difference. We are seeing the turnaround on some of not only the IT metrics, but more importantly, the operational metrics that we’ve been working on with our first AMS client. That will be a real focus for us over the next couple of years.

Healthcare in this country is, unfortunately, systemically and fundamentally broken. No single individual or single branch of government can turn that around. It can be overwhelming, particularly at the macro level.

I encourage our customers, other vendors, and our team to adopt the Boy Scout model and leave it better than you found it. Identify the particular area where you can make an impact. Even if you are just one analyst at one client, you can make an impact. Or you may be the CEO of a vendor that is seeking to make a difference between payer and provider collaboration.

Everyone can ultimately contribute to making those small impacts. Then, in aggregate, hopefully we can start to move healthcare towards a model that’s more sustainable for us as a country.

Morning Headlines 3/30/26

March 29, 2026 Headlines No Comments

HMA Acquires HealthTech Solutions, Expanding Technology Capabilities and Medicaid Expertise

Health Management Associates acquires Medicaid-focused technology, analytics, and compliance company HealthTech Solutions.

Stryker rules out ransomware, confirms threat actor used non-propagating malicious file

Medical device maker Stryker rules out ransomware as it continues to investigate the cyberattack that disrupted its internal systems two weeks ago.

CareCloud says one EHR environment hit in New Jersey

Ambulatory health IT vendor CareCloud investigates a third-party’s unauthorized access of one of its EHR environments on March 16.

EMed Raises $200 Million at $2 Billion Plus Valuation

Employer-focused, digital GLP-1 program company EMed raises $200 million in a Series A funding round.

Cash-Pay Health Has a $100 Billion Infrastructure Problem. We Just Raised $7.5M to Fix It.

Vitl, which specializes in e-prescribing technology for practices that don’t accept insurance, announces $7.5 million in Series A funding.

Monday Morning Update 3/30/26

March 29, 2026 News No Comments

Top News

 image

Andy Crowder, Advocate Health SVP / chief digital and AI officer, describes how Advocate is using Epic’s Agent Factory to create four prototypes that it plans to placed into production in July. .

Advocate convened an agile sprint for pharmacy complex order verification and infusion charting prep, which yielded the four prototypes.


Reader Comments

From Skeptical Clinician: “Re: Perplexity Health. Every new healthcare AI entrant promises trustworthy answers, which is comforting right up until you remember that healthcare already has plenty of confident systems that are wrong in more expensive ways.” At least “confidently wrong” will now scale.


HIStalk Announcements and Requests

image

Poll respondents envision providers and payers getting into AI wars over billing codes, which doesn’t seem farfetched. Both sides could claim intentional injustice, but the American way is that proven or admitted fraud generates a financial penalty but no jail time for those who knew it was happening, so it’s just a cost of doing business with positive ROI as long as the profit exceeds the penalty.

New poll to your right or here, as inspired by the Reddit post last week: Should patients have the sole approval for sending their medical records to any third-party tool they choose?

image

Reader donations to Mr. H’s Los Angeles elementary school class funded his Donors Choose teacher grant request for Spanish-language books to help the 75% of his students who are English learners. He reports, “My students have been grabbing the new books left and right. Many of them are getting upset when they want to change their book, but it has been taken. It is great to see the love of reading flourish again in my classroom. This could not have happened without your donation.”

I’ve been frustrated by an IPad problem where the back-arrow and close window icons at the top of portrait-mode screens overlay screen content, making it impossible to go back a page or close the window without tilting over to landscape mode. I Google extensively for an answer that never came, but I noticed that an IOS upgrade was waiting for me to clear some space because it was huge. It seems to have fixed the problem.


Sponsored Events and Resources

None scheduled soon. Contact Lorre to have your resource listed.


Sales

  • San Juan Regional Medical Center will implement PerfectServe for scheduling, secure communication, alerting, patient outreach, and switchboard workflows.

Announcements and Implementations

Advocate Health will launch the country’s largest hospital-based drone delivery network, using Zipline drones to deliver prescriptions, lab specimens, and medical supplies in three of its markets, starting in Charlotte, NC. Advocate expects drones to make 100,000 deliveries per year.

Analysis finds that one or two health systems control the entire inpatient healthcare market in half of US metropolitan areas. Concentration in 97% of metro areas exceeds FTC/DOJ antitrust levels.

Praia Health is granted a US patent for performing identity and access management for EHR instances.


Government and Politics

image

This is not a good look for the VA, especially if John Windom starts naming companies and executives in his trial.


Other

A study finds that people who use their phones during bathroom visits have a 46% higher risk of hemorrhoids because they spend more time on the toilet after getting distracted by scrolling news or social media.


Sponsor Updates

  • TrustCommerce will sponsor the NEECO Spring 2026 Conference March 31 in Waltham, MA.
  • VisiQuate VP of Growth Michelle Taylor joins the NAHSE NorCal Board of Directors.
  • Vyne Medical releases a new case study titled “How Automation is Shaping the Future of Document Management at VHC Health.”

Blog Posts


Contacts

Mr. H, Lorre, Jenn, Dr. Jayne.
Get HIStalk updates.
Send news or rumors.
Follow on X, Bluesky, and LinkedIn.
Sponsorship information.
Contact us.

Morning Headlines 3/27/26

March 26, 2026 Headlines No Comments

Collectly to Acquire Pledge Health to Accelerate AI Automation Across the Patient Financial Experience

Patient financial experience platform vendor Collectly acquires Pledge Health, which offers pre-service patient financial workflow automation.

Blossom Health Brings in $20M for its AI-Powered Psychiatry Platform

Blossom Health, which offers virtual therapy and medication management, announces $20 million in funding.

Veterans Affairs Senior Executive Charged With Concealing Gifts and Cash Received from Government Contractors

A former VA executive who led its Cerner EHR modernization project is indicted for accepting, concealing, and at times soliciting gifts from contractors that were involved in the project.

News 3/27/26

March 26, 2026 News 4 Comments

Top News

image

India-based IT services firm Infosys will acquire Optimum Healthcare IT for $465 million in an all-cash deal.

The seller is private equity firm Achieve Partners, which acquired Optimum in June 2020.

INFY shares have lost 30% in the past 12 months, valuing the company at $54 billion.


Reader Comments

From Purity: “Re: AI. What happens when payer and provider AI systems collide over denials? Hospital AI finds that denials may not be based on rational reason, then the insurer AI sees that and starts randomizing denials to confuse the provider AI?” Payers know that regulators won’t tolerate AI that invents or randomizes denial logic, so payers will keep systems defensible but not necessarily transparent. The battleground will be the rules themselves and how they are applied, which could force greater scrutiny. The likely outcome isn’t chaos, but exposure of a process that feels arbitrary because it is tuned for insurer profit rather than grounded in medical evidence. The only real disruptors, short of federal action, are high-profile patient stories that generate bad press and spook shareholders.


Sponsored Events and Resources

None scheduled soon. Contact Lorre to have your resource listed.


Acquisitions, Funding, Business, and Stock

image

Healthcare AI governance platform vendor Qualified Health raises $125 million in Series B funding.

image

Trovo Health, which offers AI-powered clinical care teams, renames itself Thesis Care and raises a $45 million Series A round.

image

Dimer Health, which offers AI-supported post-discharge medical oversight, raises $13.5 million in Series A funding.

image

RCM automation vendor Adonis raises $40 million in Series C funding.


Sales


People

image image

Artera hires Damon Lanphear (Amazon) as CTO and promotes Nicole Ossey to SVP of people.


Announcements and Implementations

image

Epic-based virtual care provider KeyCare deploys Nvidia’s Nemotron large language model to power its AI-driven patient intake agent that collects information from patients during their pre-visit wait and summarizes it for their clinician.

Artesia General Hospital (NM) integrates Microsoft Dragon Copilot ambient listening with its TruBridge EHR.

Patient financial experience platform vendor Collectly acquires Pledge Health, which offers pre-service patient financial workflow automation.


Government and Politics

image

A former VA executive who led its Cerner EHR modernization project is indicted for accepting, concealing, and at times soliciting gifts from contractors that were involved in the project. John Windom, who served as executive director of the VA’s EHR modernization effort, faces up to 20 years in prison on charges of falsifying records, making false statements, and concealing material facts. The indictment alleges that he cultivated a group of six contractors, which he called the “Power Group,” who were assigned to him for mentoring related to obtaining government business as minorities. Prosecutors say that he coerced members into providing improper personal benefits and advancing diversity-related objectives that were unrelated to the EHR modernization project.

Health New Zealand warns staff that using free tools to write clinical notes is prohibited due to privacy risks, including drafting notes that are then pasted into official systems.

image

Florida insurance regulators suspend Mirra Health Care from processing claims for three Medicare Advantage HMOs after learning that the company outsourced the work to unlicensed firms in India and the Philippines


Other

image

West Suburban Medical Center (IL) temporarily closes after billing system problems reduce revenue by 90%, leaving it unable to cover payroll. Parent company Resilience Healthcare, which also operated the recently shuttered Weiss Memorial Hospital, signed a contract to implement Altera Digital Health’s Paragon EHR in November 2023.

image

A Redditor posts and then deletes a message describing how they “built an open-source MyChart to Claude connector. You can use it to manage (read/write) all your health records in MyChart from Claude.” Other Redditors were appalled:

  • You have a setup that … effectively removes the user’s 2FA protections. Also, you have a button to deploy this on your site that includes an Oauth activation via Gmail, so effectively a user would be tying their Gmail identity together with their MyChart username? If so, you’re in some pretty dicey territory, not even considering Epic’s likely response to this repo and use.
  • So you have attempted to reverse engineer Epic’s MyChart internal APIs? I hope you understand how much Epic will not only hate this, but also will go after you. I honestly would recommend taking this down and removing this post here.
  • Jesus Christ OP this is a massive risk to patient privacy. I recognize that you’re trying to build something helpful, but healthcare is not the place for the move fast and break things tech mindset … the benefits here are limited whereas you risk exposing essentially all of a patient’s PHI while compromising 2FA protections across potentially multiple accounts.
  • Epic already beat you to it with Emmie. Also, you’re better off connecting your data using QHIN and TEFCA authorization. MyChart is hiding a TON of functionality and data from you.
  • Has anyone pointed out to you how many HIPAA violations this is?
  • Holy f*** this is vibe coded slop. You’re not handling encryption or creds properly whatsoever. There are other violations to PHI protection than storage that you’re committing here.
  • Exciting legal consequences ahead for you if this takes off even a little bit, and you deserve every one of them.

Sponsor Updates

  • Health Data Movers names Lisa Edler, MBA senior RCM consultant.
  • Infinx appoints Jon Vitiello, MBA to its advisory board.
  • Consensus Cloud Solutions is named a 2026 CSO Awards winner, which honors organizations that implement innovative cybersecurity initiatives.
  • Meditech Chief Nursing Executive Cathy Turner, MBA, RN-BC will present at the ANIA Annual Conference March 28 in Boston and at the AONL Inspiring Leaders Conference March 30 in Chicago.
  • MRO releases a new report titled “2026 State of the Industry: Navigating Health Policy and Market Shifts with Smarter Data.”
  • Navina will exhibit at the AMGA Annual Conference April 15-18 in Las Vegas.
  • Jefferson Regional, Pine Bluff Medical Center goes live on Altera Digital Health’s Sunrise 25.1.

Blog Posts


Contacts

Mr. H, Lorre, Jenn, Dr. Jayne.
Get HIStalk updates.
Send news or rumors.
Follow on X, Bluesky, and LinkedIn.
Sponsorship information.
Contact us.

EPtalk by Dr. Jayne 3/26/26

March 26, 2026 Dr. Jayne 2 Comments

I was excited to learn about Perplexity Health. It gave me the idea of how to potentially solve the nightly “what should we have for dinner” question.

The announcement mentions that the tool can link to health records, fitness app data, blood pressure tracking, and weight data. It can couple fitness, activity, and vital sign data with lab results, which allows it to identify the time periods in which patients had a certain state of health. If people track their dietary information, they can track what they are eating each day.

Assuming that people log meals that they enjoyed, I would love to be able to tell my patients to ask, ”AI tool, look at that time in 2023 when I lost 20 pounds and my cholesterol was great. Then make me a meal plan that will replicate those conditions so that I can do it again.” Now THAT would be a good use of AI. I don’t have a paid subscription to Perplexity, but I might try this with other AI tools. More to come.

The National Resident Matching Program, also known as “The Match,” occurred last week. I was heartened to see that family medicine recruited another record-breaking class. Eight hundred family medicine residency programs offered 5,512 positions, which is the largest number ever. Of those, 4,613 positions were filled in the main match. Unmatched residents are still trying to link with open positions, so that number is likely to climb over the next week. Official numbers typically aren’t published until May.

Family medicine residency programs have offered an increasing number of positions for 17 years and the number of programs is also increasing. However, a forecast predicts that we will have a 40,000-physician deficit in primary care by 2036. As one might anticipate given recent changes in immigration policies, match rates declined for non-US citizens who attended medical school outside the US, with the lowest match rate seen in five years.

From Borderless Doctor: “Re: travel-related illness. I work at an emergency department that’s closest to a major international airport. I have seen some interesting travel-related illnesses, including plenty of patients who have infections that are not typically seen in the US and can spread quickly where hygiene might be poor. This article about Kansas health workers gearing up for the World Cup makes me wonder whether surrounding institutions will make EHR changes to encourage providers to consider different clinical possibilities.” I hadn’t seen anything about this, so I appreciate the share.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment is preparing for the potential influx of 650,000 visitors by educating physicians and public health workers. Although most clinicians might think of respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses first, a state epidemiologist who was quoted in the article also mentions an increase in sexually transmitted infections.

The department plans to publish weekly reports to educate health workers on the current status of outbreaks, especially given that visitors from the southern hemisphere may be bringing illnesses that aren’t typically seen at that time of year in North America.

The article mentions that Missouri is a little behind Kansas in preparing and is still planning its website, but Kansas has its site live. I’m sure that interagency coordination will occur, but this is a situation where a national focus on health and preparedness could shine.

Clinicians are encouraged to think about travel histories. As an informaticist, I can imagine some temporary popups in the EHR, especially for urgent care and other acute settings, that remind staff to ask specific questions similar to what they did when we last saw Ebola virus in the US.

If you work in a facility in the Kansas City area, I would be interested to hear about your plans. Otherwise, everyone should wash their hands, cover their coughs, and stay home if they are ill.

My healthcare tech worker friends are always having heated discussions about remote versus hybrid versus in-office work, and also the tools that organizations use to monitor employee productivity. One colleague shared this article about JP Morgan Chase’s use of technology to monitor junior members of their workforce. They compare self-reported work habits with the data that their IT systems capture.

Company spokespeople say that the effort is intended to increase awareness and to promote wellbeing among staffers who are working excessive hours. The bank limits junior staff to 80-hour workweeks.

It would be interesting to use similar tracking for medical residents to see how their actual hours worked stack up against their work hour limits. I suspect that a fair amount of work goes on behind the scenes after residents are required to leave the hospital, but I haven’t seen any articles about this kind of research.

OpenEvidence announces, in conjunction with Rare Disease Month, new features for engaging with content around rare conditions. The company has partnered with the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD). I was surprised to see Wilson’s disease as the example that they used to showcase the new rare disease summaries. I saw several cases of it in medical school and didn’t realize that it was truly that rare.

That’s the kind of bias that you can develop when training at a tertiary center. You are exposed to cases at different rates than they present in the actual population.

The partnership also supports the development of patient-friendly content that will be surfaced within the tool and distributed through the NORD Rare Disease Database.

In using AI tools, I’ve recently become a big fan of Claude for tone, content production, and overall usability. The company has opened access to some features that were previously available only to paid users to those with free plans, which was a nice surprise.

Anthropic says that Claude will remain ad-free, in response to OpenAI’s plan to display advertising for users who aren’t paying for a subscription. Claude’s free features include file creation, skills, and connectors, which I’m eager to try. I don’t use non-work AI tools as much as some people, so the conversation limits for free accounts haven’t been a barrier.

Even though I think it’s a great tool, it wasn’t able to help me track down the name of a book that I couldn’t remember. It had a complex plot involving a woman who committed a crime, became a detective, and later was called to investigate that same crime. I don’t remember finishing the book and searched in several ways to find it. The human brain finally remembered that it was a “plot within a plot” kind of book, where the protagonist was a crime writer and the plot I was thinking of was the one in her current novel.

I went back to Claude with the answer in hopes of better training the tool. The response was interesting. Claude said that it was essentially unsearchable because “no plot summary would mention it, because it’s a subplot within a completely different genre of book … It’s a genuinely tricky one that I don’t think I could have ever found through searching alone, and it’s a lovely example of how a book-within-a-book can stick in your memory as vividly as the main story itself!”

Are you a voracious reader? How do you track what you’ve read? Leave a comment or email me.

Email Dr. Jayne.

Morning Headlines 3/26/26

March 25, 2026 Headlines No Comments

Infosys to Acquire Leading Healthcare Digital Transformation Company, Optimum Healthcare IT

Infosys will acquire healthcare IT consulting firm Optimum Healthcare IT.

Thesis Care Announces $45 Million Series A to Scale AI-Powered Clinical Teams Across Healthcare

Thesis Care, which offers AI agents for care management, care delivery, and clinical operations, announces $45 million in Series A funding.

Qualified Health Raises $125M Series B to Meet Growing Demand for Enterprise AI Transformation Across Health Systems

Enterprise healthcare AI deployment and management company Qualified Health raises $125 million.

Dimer Health Raises $13.5 Million To Rebuild Post-Discharge Care With Clinician-Led AI

Dimer Health will use $13.5 million in new funding to expand its transitional care model and further develop its clinical AI platform’s predictive capabilities and workflow automation.

Adonis Raises $40M Series C to Equip Healthcare Providers with AI‑Driven Revenue Cycle Operations

RCM vendor Adonis announces $40 million in Series C funding, bringing its total raised to $95 million.

Text Ads


RECENT COMMENTS

  1. There's a typo in your Oracle headline where it says "debilitating wave of layoffs."

  2. Apparently harder than this guy could code at least. I suspect the legal grey area is when they're offering a…

  3. I'm not saying that sounds particularly desirable BUT If i WANT to give my login to this site, so that…

  4. I'm not going to claim to be technically savvy here, but my understanding is that it was hosting all of…

Founding Sponsors


 

Platinum Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSS Webinars

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.